Hypocritical weasel

I heard Michael Medved yesterday questioning whether we should "spend millions of dollars and possibly ruin a man's career" for only lying under oath, referring to the prosecution of Scooter Libby in the Valerie Plame case. Seems to me, Medved and his ilk were really upset about Clinton lying about his blowjob, not the act itself. Remember how concerned those folks were about integrity and values, how they should be paramount in our public officials? Apparently those standards should be only held to Democrats.

To recap- Lying under oath about a blowjob is necessary to spend millions investigating and worth impeaching a president. Lying about blowing the cover of a CIA agent is not that big a deal. Good thing the Republicans are the ones who are "serious" about national security.